The twenty -ninth round of the Saudi Professional Roshen League witnessed the 2024/2025 season of controversial arbitration cases that raised the interest of fans and sports analysts. Technology, like VAR technology, is one of the main axes in discussions, as it contributed with decisive decisions that sparked controversy and varied about opinions, whether between coaches or the players themselves. With the escalation of competition at the end of the season, the arbitration roles represent a crucial element in determining the course of the competing teams.
Controversial arbitration cases in the 29th round of the Saudi League
You might care The date of the Real Madrid match against Getafe in the Spanish League and the carrier channels
The tour was launched on April 21 and witnessed several strong confrontations between the top clubs of the Roshen League. The matches included the most prominent round of the round between Al -Hilal and Al -Shabab, which ended in a positive tie with two goals for each team. The meeting witnessed many exciting arbitration decisions, such as the first goal of Al -Hilal, which young players objected to, demanding that it be canceled on the pretext of a mistake in building the attack. The referee of the meeting used the video technology and confirmed the authenticity of the goal, which caused confusion among the fans. Also, in the 51st minute of the match, Al -Shabab called for a penalty kick, but the referee’s decision confirmed that the players were normal.
VAR technology decisions in Al -Nasr match and your embrace
Also continue Neum officially climbs and turns the Roshen League scales with exceptional aspirations
The victory match witnessed a great excitement and ended with victory 3-2. Despite the many goals, the arbitration decisions were relatively less compared to other matches. One of the most prominent cases was the argument that was in the 77th minute when the referee refused to calculate a penalty for victory after interfering over Autafeut, and relied on the video technology to make his final decision, which sparked the dissatisfaction of some of the victory fans despite the analysts confirming the validity of the decision.
Analysis of arbitration cases in the Al -Ahly and Al -Wahda match
A proposed article Al -Ahly and Pyramids: a decisive confrontation between a deceitful and unacceptable return of
Al -Ahly’s confrontation against Al -Wahda witnessed a usual excitement and ended with Al -Ahly winning three goals to two. The first goal of the unit was the most prominent dialectical cases, as it raised doubts about the intervention of the unit striker with the goalkeeper. The television replay confirmed that the goalkeeper was the one who erred in appreciation, which prompted the ruling to calculate the goal properly.
In general, round 29 remains an example of the importance of fair arbitration in the advanced stages of championships, and teams will have to focus on performance to resolve competition away from the recession of control decisions that may affect them in the future.
