Hi Koura-Egyptian arbitration analyst Mohamed Kamal Risha criticized the performance of the Argentine referee Fukono Tilo in the Al-Fateh and Al-Ittihad match, which ended with the victory of the first 2-0, indicating that the referee neglected the expulsion of Portuguese defender Danilo Pereira at the beginning of the second half.
Risha described the match as rich in controversial arbitration situations, as the referee showed efficiency in some cases, but he failed in another.
He emphasized that Pereira was worth a red card after interfering with one of the players of Al -Fateh, which deprived them of the opportunity of a certain goal, stressing that all the opportunity conditions were available.
The feather also criticized the referee’s decision to calculate a penalty for the union, which Fabinho wasted, as he considered that the touch of defender Georgy Fernandez was normal and did not require calculating a kick.
He also indicated that the ruling launched his whistle before Benzema could score a goal, which prevented the Union of the opportunity to review the situation.
On the other hand, a feather with Tello agreed not to calculate a penalty for opening after a hand of a hand from Abdul -Ilah Al -Omari, considering that the hand was in a normal position.
In conclusion, the decision to cancel the Fatwa goal was supported by an illegal touch during the implementation of the penalty, which highlights the importance of technology in making the right decisions.
